<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Abstract Painting Under Wraps: David Hammons at L&amp;M Arts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.artcritical.com/2011/02/24/david-hammons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.artcritical.com/2011/02/24/david-hammons/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 17:47:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.artcritical.com/2011/02/24/david-hammons/comment-page-1/#comment-15107</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artcritical.com/?p=14291#comment-15107</guid>
		<description>What is the meaning of the door?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the meaning of the door?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joanna thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.artcritical.com/2011/02/24/david-hammons/comment-page-1/#comment-4918</link>
		<dc:creator>joanna thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 13:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artcritical.com/?p=14291#comment-4918</guid>
		<description>isnt Hammons reiterating what he has always said,why should he play to an art audience,of over educated people who are no fun</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>isnt Hammons reiterating what he has always said,why should he play to an art audience,of over educated people who are no fun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sweetman</title>
		<link>http://www.artcritical.com/2011/02/24/david-hammons/comment-page-1/#comment-3530</link>
		<dc:creator>sweetman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 12:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artcritical.com/?p=14291#comment-3530</guid>
		<description>Good commentary after suffering through those of Schjeldahl and Saltz.  Hammonds shows us that good abstract painting is not so easy to dash off. The painted part is a very weak link in his show!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good commentary after suffering through those of Schjeldahl and Saltz.  Hammonds shows us that good abstract painting is not so easy to dash off. The painted part is a very weak link in his show!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
